Does Acupuncture Improve Live Birth Rates?
From an Acupuncturist, This May Surprise You
It’s the question I’m asked most often: does acupuncture actually help you get pregnant?
You might expect an acupuncturist to say yes without hesitation. But after 14 years of supporting fertility and IVF cycles, my honest answer is this: acupuncture on its own doesn’t appear to change live birth rates. Looking at the research closely, and at what I’ve seen in clinic, that isn’t a reason to dismiss it. It’s a reason to use it well: as one part of a whole medical system, for the whole person and the whole family.
Let’s look at what the evidence says, where acupuncture fits, and where it doesn’t.
What the research says
| Area | What the research shows | Strength of evidence |
|---|---|---|
| IVF: short protocols vs sham | No live birth difference with two or three sessions around transfer | Moderate; consistent |
| IVF: a course of care vs IVF alone | Higher live birth rates, strongest with four or more sessions or care across more than one cycle | Low certainty |
| Whole-systems Chinese medicine with IVF | Higher odds of live birth than IVF alone or transfer-day acupuncture | Observational only |
| Frozen embryo transfer | Larger pregnancy and live birth gains reported in pooled trials | Low certainty |
| Recurrent implantation failure | Better clinical pregnancy rates in small trials; large cohorts using two sessions show no live birth benefit | Low; mixed |
| IUI | Very few trials; the Cochrane review found none to analyse | Very limited |
| Ovulation (PCOS) | No clear difference from sham for ovulation or live birth | Low certainty |
| Low ovarian reserve | More eggs, better embryos and possibly higher live birth rates in small trials | Low |
| Natural conception | One small pilot trial | Very limited |
| Male factor | Possible improvement in sperm count and motility | Low quality |
| Endometriosis | Less period and pelvic pain than sham | Low to moderate |
| Threatened miscarriage and recurrent loss | Mostly herbal or combined Chinese medicine studies; acupuncture alone barely studied | Very limited |
| Stress and wellbeing | Less stress and anxiety during IVF | Moderate; consistent |
IVF support and live birth
This is where most of the research sits, and it’s where things get interesting.
The most rigorous trial was Australian. In 2018, researchers gave 848 women in 16 IVF clinics across Australia and New Zealand either real or sham acupuncture during their cycle. Live birth rates were almost identical: 18.3% with acupuncture and 17.8% with sham. The 2013 Cochrane review, which pooled 20 trials, also found no clear benefit for live birth.
But there’s a detail that matters. Women in that Australian trial received just three treatments: one during stimulation and two on transfer day. The lead researcher herself noted that real-world acupuncture is individualised and more frequent, and that the small number of treatments was a limitation.
That’s where the newer research comes in. A 2026 review of 18 randomised trials, involving 4,872 people having IVF or ICSI, found that adding acupuncture was linked to a 34% higher live birth rate (in relative terms) compared with IVF alone. Trials that offered four or more sessions showed stronger live birth results than those offering fewer.
It’s important to be honest about what that means. This review compared acupuncture with no acupuncture, not with sham, and the authors rated the overall certainty as low. Reviews that only look at transfer-day acupuncture continue to find no live birth benefit.
So here’s my reading: one or two treatments on transfer day is unlikely to change much. A considered course of care, as part of a wider plan, is a different thing entirely, and that’s what the more recent research is starting to reflect.
The live birth studies, side by side
There are more than 40 trials and many reviews on acupuncture and IVF, so no single article can list them all. These are the main studies that measured live birth, the outcome that matters most.
| Study | What was compared | Live birth finding |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 review, 18 trials, 4,872 people | Acupuncture plus IVF vs IVF alone | 34% higher in relative terms; stronger with four or more sessions; low certainty |
| 2026 review, 885 women with low ovarian reserve | Acupuncture vs no acupuncture during IVF | Higher live birth rates; small, lower-quality trials |
| 2025 review, transfer-day trials | Transfer-day acupuncture vs sham | No difference |
| 2025 network review of treatment schedules | Different timings, numbers and lengths of treatment | Small increase overall; timing and frequency appear to matter |
| 2024 review, 38 trials, 5,991 people | Timing and dose of acupuncture | Higher live birth with longer courses and before frozen transfers |
| 2018 Australian trial, 848 women | Three sessions vs sham | No difference (18.3% vs 17.8%) |
| 2017 PCOS trial, 1,000 women | Acupuncture vs sham, with or without clomiphene | No difference |
| 2015 US study, 1,069 IVF cycles | Whole-systems Chinese medicine vs IVF alone vs transfer-day acupuncture | About double the odds of live birth vs IVF alone; observational |
| 2013 Cochrane review, 20 trials | Acupuncture vs sham or no treatment | No clear benefit |
| 2008 BMJ review, 7 trials, 1,366 women | Transfer-day acupuncture vs sham or none | Higher live birth; benefit smaller in clinics with higher baseline success |
The pattern is clear once you line them up. Short, standardised protocols compared with sham show no difference. Longer, individualised courses of care, especially as part of whole-systems Chinese medicine, show benefit. Those studies are less rigorous in design, so they point in a direction rather than prove it.
Why does the research disagree?
Reading through these studies, it can look as though acupuncture improves live birth rates. But most of them don’t meet the standard needed to say that with confidence. Here’s why.
- The positive studies mostly compare acupuncture with no acupuncture. That shows people did better, but not why. Extra care, attention, relaxation and simply having someone in your corner could all play a part alongside the needling itself. That’s arguably closer to real practice, but it can’t prove acupuncture is the active ingredient.
- Many of the positive trials are small, unblinded or run in a single clinic, often where baseline IVF success rates were lower. Small trials swing more easily, positive results are more likely to be published, and some trials only report pregnancy rates, not live births. That’s why reviewers rate the overall certainty as low. Low certainty doesn’t mean no effect. It means we can’t be confident how big the effect is.
- Observational studies can’t rule out self-selection. People who choose whole-systems Chinese medicine may be different from those who don’t. A 2026 study found people using it alongside frozen embryo transfers tended to come from higher-income neighbourhoods. More resources often means better food, more support and less financial stress, which can affect outcomes too.
- The most rigorous trials tested the weakest version of acupuncture. The big sham-controlled trials used the same standardised points for everyone, over two or three sessions around a procedure. That isn’t how anyone practises. And sham acupuncture isn’t truly inert: a needle pressing on the skin and half an hour lying calmly both do something, which can shrink the difference between groups.
So here’s the tension. The best-designed trials test the least realistic version of acupuncture, and the most realistic studies are the least rigorous. Neither gives the full answer on its own. Together, they point towards individualised, longer, whole-system care.
None of this takes away from the people behind those numbers. Even a few percentage points means real women and families holding babies they might not have had. That is worth celebrating. But for every family celebrating, there are more who didn’t see those results. It’s those women and families I want to find answers for.
What the research also tells us is that one-size-fits-all doesn’t work. The same few points on every person, on the same days, rarely beats sham. Treatment shaped to the individual — their diagnosis, their patterns, their timing and their life — is where the benefit starts to show. That’s a strong case for individualised care.
Ovulation support
PCOS is the most common cause of irregular ovulation, so it’s been well studied. A large 2017 trial of 1,000 women with PCOS found that acupuncture, with or without the ovulation drug clomiphene, didn’t improve live birth rates compared with sham. The 2025 Cochrane update agreed: no clear difference from sham acupuncture for ovulation, pregnancy or live birth.
This doesn’t mean nothing changes for women with PCOS during treatment. It means acupuncture alone isn’t a substitute for addressing the metabolic, hormonal and lifestyle drivers underneath it.
Natural conception
This may surprise you most: there is very little research on acupuncture for couples trying to conceive naturally. One small Australian pilot trial of 56 women compared acupuncture plus lifestyle changes with lifestyle changes alone. Women in the acupuncture group reported greater fertility awareness and wellbeing, but pregnancy rates weren’t statistically different.
That’s not evidence it doesn’t work. It’s an honest gap.
Male factor fertility
Around half of fertility challenges involve sperm, yet men are often an afterthought. Several small studies suggest acupuncture may improve sperm concentration and motility. But reviews consistently find these studies too small and too high in bias to be confident.
What I will say is this: sperm takes around three months to develop, and it responds to how a man eats, sleeps, drinks, moves and manages stress. That’s where his health, and your future child’s health, really begins.
IUI
IUI is often the first step in assisted fertility, yet it’s barely been studied with acupuncture. The Cochrane review found no trials in IUI or ovulation induction that met its standards. A handful of small studies exist, but nothing strong enough to draw conclusions either way.
Frozen transfers and recurrent implantation failure
Frozen embryo transfers are where some of the more encouraging findings sit. A 2024 review reported larger gains in pregnancy and live birth when acupuncture was given before frozen transfers.
For recurrent implantation failure, a 2021 review of small trials found higher clinical pregnancy rates with acupuncture. But a large 2026 cohort of nearly 2,000 women found that two sessions around transfer made no difference to live birth. Once again, two sessions isn’t a course of care.
Low ovarian reserve
A 2026 review of 885 women with diminished ovarian reserve found acupuncture was linked to more eggs retrieved, more good-quality embryos, and higher pregnancy and live birth rates. The trials were small and mostly from China, so this is promising rather than proven.
Endometriosis
Acupuncture has some of its better evidence here, though for symptoms rather than fertility outcomes. A 2023 trial of 106 women found real acupuncture reduced period pain and shortened its duration compared with sham, although the effect faded once treatment stopped. Reviews agree it can meaningfully reduce pelvic pain and improve quality of life.
Threatened miscarriage and recurrent pregnancy loss
Threatened miscarriage, bleeding in an early pregnancy that’s still viable, affects around one in five pregnancies. Medical care is often “wait and see”. Australian researchers have argued acupuncture deserves study as supportive care, but the research is still at an early, pilot stage.
For recurrent pregnancy loss, a 2026 review found Chinese medicine was associated with better pregnancy outcomes. Most of those studies used herbal medicine, and the authors called for higher-quality trials. Acupuncture on its own has barely been tested.
Stress and wellbeing
The most consistent finding across the research is that acupuncture helps people feel calmer and less anxious during IVF. A 2025 study of nearly 1,900 treatments at a US fertility centre found meaningful drops in stress, pain and anxiety within a single session. That matters. Fertility treatment is hard, and how you feel moving through it counts.
Where acupuncture fits: it starts with the whole picture
Before I decide whether acupuncture belongs in your plan, I need to understand what’s actually going on, for both of you. That starts with a head-to-toe assessment, seen through three lenses.
- Energy (Chinese medicine): your pulse, tongue, cycle, sleep, digestion, temperature and emotions, read as patterns that show how your body is functioning as a whole
- Biomedicine: pathology, semen analysis, scans, cycle tracking and your medical history, to find or rule out infection, immune, metabolic, hormonal and structural issues
- Reality (lived experience): what your life actually looks like — work, stress, relationships, food, sleep, past fertility experiences, and what’s realistic for you right now
Head to toe means we look at everything that feeds into fertility: cycles and hormones, digestion and the gut, thyroid and metabolism, immunity and inflammation, the nervous system and sleep, sperm and male health, and any history of losses, procedures or treatment. Every system, every
Only once I can see the whole picture do I look at where acupuncture fits. Sometimes it’s central. Sometimes it’s a supporting player. Sometimes it isn’t the priority yet.
Acupuncture plays a supporting role alongside medical treatment for infection or immune issues, alongside changes to food and lifestyle, and through an IVF or transfer cycle as part of a longer course of care.
Acupuncture isn’t the first priority when there’s an untreated infection, unmanaged insulin resistance, or something that hasn’t been properly diagnosed yet.
Where acupuncture can’t do it alone
I’d be doing you a disservice if I didn’t say this clearly. Acupuncture can’t:
- Clear an infection. Chronic endometritis, ureaplasma, mycoplasma or other infections need proper testing and integrative treatment.
- Bring down an increased viral load. Active or reactivated viral infections need testing and integrative management.
- Fix an autoimmune condition. Thyroid autoimmunity, coeliac disease and other autoimmune conditions need diagnosis and targeted care.
- Resolve an NK cell issue. Raised natural killer cell activity is still a debated area in fertility medicine. It needs assessment by a specialist who works in reproductive immunology and integrative care.
- Reverse insulin resistance. That takes changes to food, movement and sleep, and sometimes medication.
- Correct vaginal or seminal dysbiosis. An imbalanced microbiome in the vagina or semen needs testing and targeted treatment, often for both partners.
- Repair digestion on its own. If your gut isn’t absorbing nutrients well, your eggs and sperm feel it. That takes diet, sometimes testing, and integrative care.
- Replace the foundations. Needles can’t undo poor eating habits, ongoing sleep debt or unmanaged stress. Those daily choices are the ground everything else stands on, and acupuncture works best on top of them, not instead of them.
If one of these is driving your fertility challenges, acupuncture alone won’t be enough, no matter how many sessions you have.
So is there a time when acupuncture can carry more of the load? In my experience, yes: when the main thing in the way is stress in its early stages. A nervous system that’s run hot for a while can unsettle sleep, cycles and ovulation before anything has shifted structurally or become entrenched. That’s where I see acupuncture do some of its best work. The catch is that I rarely get to see people at that early stage. By the time most couples find me, they’ve often been trying for years, and stress has had time to settle in and spread.
Acupuncture was never meant to work alone
Acupuncture was never designed to be used on its own. It’s one branch of Chinese medicine, a whole medical system that includes herbal medicine, diet, movement such as qigong and tai chi, rest, moxibustion and how we live through the seasons.
Most research takes the needles out of that system and tests them in two or three sessions around a procedure. That’s a bit like testing whether a single vegetable improves heart health without changing anything else about someone’s diet. It tells us something, but not how the medicine is actually practised.
The studies that look at whole-systems Chinese medicine are closer to real life. In a 2015 US study of more than 1,000 IVF cycles, people who had whole-systems care had about twice the odds of a live birth compared with IVF alone, and higher odds than those who had acupuncture on transfer day only. It was an observational study, so it can’t prove cause, but it fits what I see.
Chinese medicine also treats the whole person: body, mind, emotions and the life around them. And in fertility it should treat the whole family. Both partners bring their health into conception, and that health carries into pregnancy, into your children, and into the generation after them.
Infertility is a whole-body, whole-couple condition
Infertility is complicated and multisystem. It can involve hormones, immunity, metabolism, digestion, the nervous system, sperm quality, and the stress of the journey itself. It needs more than one lens.
More importantly, it needs a correct diagnosis and focused treatment. Without knowing why you’re struggling, any treatment is a guess.
Here’s what I’ve seen in 14 years. The people who get the best results, not just a pregnancy, but a healthy pregnancy and a healthy family, including partner’s health, have a few things in common:
- They’re in it together, as a couple (if this is your family status)
- They’re curious about how they can improve their health and wellbeing
- They’re invested in their own health and the future health of their family
- Acupuncture usually isn’t the only thing they’ve done; they’ve also changed how they eat, sleep, move and live
That’s not a coincidence. It’s what whole-person care looks like.
This is the New Wave of fertility care
Slow. Whole system. Whole body. Whole family.
Fertility care has spent a long time chasing speed. The next cycle, the next transfer, the next protocol. But for many couples, the fastest path skips the questions that matter most.
The new wave is slower and more considered. It asks why before it asks what next. It brings biomedicine and Chinese medicine together rather than choosing between them. It looks at the whole body, not just the uterus or the sperm count. And it treats both partners, because the health you bring into conception is the health you pass on to your children and beyond.
Acupuncture has a beautiful place in that picture. It’s just not the whole picture.
Where to start
If you’re wondering whether acupuncture fits your situation, the first step isn’t needles. It’s understanding what’s really going on for both of you.
The Search is my initial consultation for solo mums or couples. We look at both partners’ history, pathology and patterns to find the reasons behind your fertility challenges. Fertility Forecast maps out what your health could look like ahead, and what focused support could help before you start trying.
If you’d like to talk about which is right for you, you’re welcome to book a connection call here.
Much love,
Paige x
References
- Smith CA, de Lacey S, Chapman M, et al. Effect of acupuncture vs sham acupuncture on live births among women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(19):1990–1998. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.5336 (Western Sydney University summary)
- Cheong YC, Dix S, Hung Yu Ng E, Ledger WL, Farquhar C. Acupuncture and assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2013;(7):CD006920. cochrane.org
- Ganchuluun T, Hsu WT, Hung SY. Efficacy of acupuncture and optimal acupoint selection for in vitro fertilization outcomes: systematic review, meta-analysis, and data mining study. European Journal of Integrative Medicine. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2026.102765
- Acupuncture as an adjunctive therapy on embryo transfer day: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical pregnancy and live birth outcomes. Frontiers in Reproductive Health. 2025;7:1673144. PubMed
- Wu XK, Stener-Victorin E, Kuang HY, et al. Effect of acupuncture and clomiphene in Chinese women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;317(24):2502–2514. Penn State record
- Zhang GS, Lim ECN, Cheng NCL, Lim CED. Acupuncture for polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2025;(10):CD007689. Western Sydney University record
- Cochrane S, Smith CA, Possamai-Inesedy A, Bensoussan A. Prior to conception: the role of an acupuncture protocol in improving women’s reproductive functioning assessed by a pilot pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2016:3587569. PMC
- Jerng UM, Jo JY, Lee S, et al. The effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for poor semen quality in infertile males: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2014;16(6):884–891. PMC
- Healthy Male. Ask the Expert: Does acupuncture help with male infertility? healthymale.org.au
- Lu R, Rodgers-Melnick SN, Flyckt R, et al. Clinical delivery of whole systems traditional Chinese medicine and impacts upon patient reported outcomes during IVF. Global Advances in Integrative Medicine and Health. 2025. PubMed
- Manheimer E, Zhang G, Udoff L, et al. Effects of acupuncture on rates of pregnancy and live birth among women undergoing in vitro fertilisation: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008;336(7643):545–549. PubMed
- Hullender Rubin LE, Opsahl MS, Wiemer KE, Mist SD, Caughey AB. Impact of whole systems traditional Chinese medicine on in-vitro fertilization outcomes. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2015;30(6):602–612. PMC
- The timing and dose effect of acupuncture on pregnancy outcomes for infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine. 2024. doi:10.1089/jicm.2023.0478
- Yang Y, Chen H, Tang H, Kuang H, Gou Y, Zhao H. Different effectiveness of acupuncture treatment schedule on ART pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2025;16:1602710. Frontiers
- Acupuncture for infertile women with diminished ovarian reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2026;17. doi:10.3389/fendo.2026.1840157
- Li M, Liu Y, Wang H, et al. The effects of acupuncture on pregnancy outcomes of recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2021:6661235. PMC
- The role of a standardised two-session peri-transfer acupuncture protocol in frozen embryo transfer for women with recurrent implantation failure: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences. 2026. doi:10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_51_26
- Li PS, Peng XM, Niu XX, et al. Efficacy of acupuncture for endometriosis-associated pain: a multicenter randomized single-blind placebo-controlled trial. Fertility and Sterility. 2023;119(5):815–823. PubMed
- Giese N, Kwon KK, Armour M. Acupuncture for endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Integrative Medicine Research. 2023;12(4):101003. DOAJ
- Betts D, Smith CA, Dahlen HG. Acupuncture as a therapeutic treatment option for threatened miscarriage. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2012;12:20. PMC
- Long Z, Zhao H, Liu F, et al. Traditional Chinese medicine for recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Science of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2026;4(1):87–95. doi:10.1097/st9.0000000000000103
This article is general information only and isn’t a substitute for personalised medical advice. Please speak with your fertility specialist or GP about your individual situation.
I’m not a trained writer, so I use AI to help translate my ideas into something clear and easy to read. The thinking, the story, and the editing are still mine. I’d rather spend my time learning better ways to treat you and help families become healthier and conceive, grow and raise healthy families, and I’m grateful for the help.



